Skip to main content

New Year's Day is not 'secular'

Not the bleak speak of mobile messages,
The soft chime of synthesised reminders,
Not texts, not pagers, data packages,
Not satnav or locators ever find us
As surely, soundly, deeply as these bells
That sound and find and call us all at once - from Malcolm Guite, 'New Year's Day: Church Bells'.

New Year's Day, we are often told in ecclesiastical circles, is 'secular'.  The Church's 'new year', we might be told, begins in Advent (actually, it doesn't - Advent marks the beginning of a new liturgical cycle).  The world may think it is New Year's Day, but the Church knows better: it's the feast of the Circumcision of Christ (traditional in the West) or Mary, Mother of God (the recent innovation in the Roman rite).  And, of course, some might remind us that 1st January as New Year is supposedly a recent observance, with Lady Day being preferred as more traditional.  So let secular culture get on with celebrating their New Year.  We, the Church, stand for something different.

The deep irony with such stances is that they collude with secularism, dismissing as 'secular' an experience which has meaning and significance for very many (not all) cultures across the globe.  To dismiss New Year as secular is to declare that "the bleak speak" shapes and determines this passage of time, rather than the deeper sound of church bells ringing out prayer, joy, and hope.

To dismiss the passing of the year as 'secular' is to fundamentally misunderstand the Church's relationship to time and place.

The Church on earth dwells within the passage of time, within the passing of years and seasons.  This is what it is to be creatures, to dwell in time and space.

He appointed the moon for certain seasons.

In the northern hemisphere, the liturgical year reflects and shares in this passage of the seasons: Lent and Easter in spring; St John the Baptist's Day at midsummer; Michaelmas and All Saint's in autumn; Christmas in midwinter.  The passage of the seasons is caught up in the Church's life of prayer, not dismissed as a 'secular' experience, but rather deepened in meaning through this relationship.  What is more, the Church also marks the passage of the seasons with particular prayer and thanksgiving: at Rogationtide; at Lammas; at Harvest and Thanksgiving.

It is similar with the passage of the years, including marking 1st January as the beginning of the new year.  As Clerk of Oxford has stated, this date is not a creation of the Enlightenment but is deeply rooted in the celebration of Christmas:

This idea of renewal and the cycle of the year is linked, of course, with the fact that Christmas and the New Year fall so close together. In the north the cusp of December and January is a time of seasonal and cosmic rebirth; with the solstice we passed the darkest midpoint of winter, and now spring is in sight. Although historically there have been various ways of reckoning when the New Year began ... the idea that Christmas or 1 January was the beginning of the new year was always around somewhere throughout the medieval period.

In the BCP 1662, this sense of New Year being embraced by Christmastide - rather than rejected as 'secular' - is seen in the rubric following the collect for Saint Stephen's Day:

Then shall follow the Collect of the Nativity, which shall be said continually unto New-year's Eve.

This was developed within the Prayer Book tradition, with the lections at Evensong on 31st December in the CofE's Revised Table of Lessons (added to BCP 1662 in 1922), CofI 1926, and PECUSA 1928 addressing the theme of time, appropriate for New Year's Eve. 

In the Prayer Book tradition, of course, 1st January is the feast of the Circumcision of Christ.  Rather than somehow displacing New Year's Day, or being a reason to reject it as 'secular', this feast gives meaning to New Year's Day, as the closing words of the appointed Gospel indicate:

And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called Jesus, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.

Anno Domini. How we name the passage of the years is determined by this feast.  The year begins with the Church celebrating, rejoicing, and affirming that the new year is Anno Domini. (Which, by the way, is good reason for Anglicans to maintain this feast day rather than imitating the Roman tradition's recent adoption of the East's Marian feast on this date, displacing the West's long-established feast of our Lord.)

Rooted in and given meaning by the Church's celebration of the mystery of the Incarnation, New Year's Eve and Day are intrinsically related to this mystery.  Even determined secular attempts to mark the occasion cannot prevent the numbering of the year witnessing to the Incarnation of our Lord.  In enfolding New Year's Day in the yearly celebration of the Lord's Nativity, the Church makes this explicit, that He is "Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending".

Filled with the new light of the Incarnate Word, New Year's Day is not, cannot be secular.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...