Skip to main content

Why should we pray Cranmer's collect for Advent II?

Blessed Lord, who hast caused all holy Scriptures to be written for our learning: Grant that we may in such wise hear them, read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest them, that by patience and comfort of thy holy Word, we may embrace and ever hold fast the blessed hope of everlasting life, which thou hast given us in our Saviour Jesus Christ. Amen.

A common feature of much recent Anglican liturgical revision has been to remove Cranmer's collect for the Second Sunday in Advent out of the season.  So, for example, in the Church of England's Common Worship it is the collect for the last Sunday after Trinity and before the 'Sundays before Advent', while in the Church of Ireland's BCP 2004 it is the collect of the 'Fifth Sunday before Advent'*. This is similar to the approach in TEC's BCP 1979, where the collect is given for Proper 28, "the Sunday closest to November 16".

Clearly those undertaking liturgical revision determined that Cranmer's collect was somehow unsuitable to the season of Advent.  Is this reading of the collect correct?  After all, even Sparrow states that "it seems not to relate to the day, yet is it an excellent prayer for all times".

Before directly answering the question, we should pause to consider the wisdom of removing from its place in the Church's year a collect that has deeply resonated.  While Cranmer's collect for Advent III was replaced in 1662, the collects for the remaining Sundays of Advent, including that for Advent II, were a fixed feature of Anglican liturgy from 1549.  This collect, then, was not a concluding thought to the Sundays after Trinity, but the second collect prayed by the Church at the beginning of another round of the liturgical year.  This certainly suggests a more prominent position than that given in contemporary liturgical calendars.

What is more, as the collect for Advent II it prayerfully commended the practice which the Church was again undertaking, of turning to Epistles and Gospels in the traditional lectionary, that for another year we might "hear them, read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest them".  It surely does seem more fitting to pray this at the yearly commencement of this practice, rather than at its conclusion.

We can, however, say more than this.  The collect is particularly suited to the Advent season.

The Epistle appointed for Advent II - beginning at Romans 15.4 - has a focus on the Scriptures of the Old Covenant:

And again, Esaias saith, There shall be a root of Jesse, and he that shall rise to reign over the Gentiles; in him shall the Gentiles trust.

The practice of reading the Scriptures of the Old Covenant embodies St Paul's understanding that in the Church the Gentiles have been "grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree", into the story of Israel.  This is particularly experienced during Advent, when the prophet Isaiah is read at Mattins and Evensong, when the Church sings "ransom captive Israel, That mourns in lonely exile here".  In the collect, the Church prays that through the reading of the Scriptures, experiencing the travails of this earthly pilgrimage, we too - in communion with exiled Israel - may be renewed in "patience".

The collect also echoes Titus 2:

Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ.

The deep eschatological yearning of the Scriptures of the New Testament thus also shapes the collect, drawing us into the hope of the earliest Apostolic communities, orienting us towards that "glorious appearing".

Finally, there is the focus of the collect, the Church's practice of attending to the holy Scriptures: to "hear them, read, mark, learn and inwardly digest them".  This practice itself as a foretaste of the Advent of the Lord:

For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

In the words of Enzo Bianchi (Prior of Bose), the encounter with Scripture is "a revelation of the divine presence". Whether in communal reading or in lectio divina, to hear and read the Scriptures is to encounter the Word whose judgement refines and purifies, an anticipation of "the last day, when he shall come again in his glorious Majesty to judge both the quick and the dead".

Cranmer's collect for the Second Sunday in Advent is deeply imbued with the themes and experiences of the season.  Above all, it takes a common practice of the Church - hearing and reading the Scriptures - and draws us to perceive it as an Advent experience.  To remove this collect from Advent is to detract from both the richness of the BCP observance of Advent and our understanding of what is experienced when we attend to the Scriptures.

----------------------

* It is worth noting that a rubric in the CofI BCP 2004 does allow Cranmer's collect - appointed for the Fifth Sunday before Advent - to be used with Order I (the traditional language rite) on Advent II.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...