Skip to main content

The Te Deum: an answer to 'What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?'

With the easing of the Covid-19 restrictions allowing for a restoration of the normal parish worship schedule, I have been preparing for the return of parish Mattins by reading Mant's Notes (1820).  The Notes assembled commentary on the Prayer Book services from Old High Church sources of the 17th to early 19th centuries.  Reading the commentary on the Te Deum, it is interesting to note how the various sources point to this canticle as as providing an answer to Tertullian's jibe. 

To begin with, we might consider how the Te Deum - with its Trinitarian and Christological emphasis - is an appropriate response to the First Lesson from the Old Testament:

The propriety of singing or reading the Te Deum after the first lesson must be evident to every observer. The Scriptures of the Old Testament set before us God's exceeding great and precious promises, the rectitude of his moral government, and his wonderful dealings with his church and people from the earliest times. If we hear these things in a proper temper of mind, they will fill us with devout sentiments of adoration and praise. And to express these sentiments in the most lively and vigorous manner, more suitable words have never been devised than those of this rational and majestick hymn (Thomas Rogers in the early 19th century).

The use of 'Holy, holy, holy: Lord God of Sabaoth' particularly expresses this continuity with Israel, with one commentator describing it as a "paraphrase on that sublime song of the heavenly host, recorded by the prophet Isaiah, vi. 3" (Peter Waldo writing in the later 18th century).  This same point is further emphasised through the words of another commentator (Thomas Secker, Archbishop of Canterbury 1758-1768):

whose acclamations therefore we humbly presume to adopt, as we find them recorded in that lofty description of the prophet. "I saw the Lord, sitting upon the throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple. Above it stood the seraphims: and one cried unto another and said , Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord God of hosts : the whole earth is full of his glory." Is . vi. 1 , 2, 3. Where it must be observed that for "God of hosts" in the prophet, is "God of sabaoth" in the hymn: the latter being the Hebrew word for the former: which both the Greek and Latin of the Old and New Testament having preserved, as comprehending more than could be well expressed by a single term of any other language.

The Te Deum follows the First Lesson from the Old Testament because it declares that the Church's faith is rooted in the Scriptures of Israel, that the God revealed to Abraham and Moses is the Most Holy Trinity, that the God of Israel redeems the world in the Incarnation, Passion, and Resurrection of the Word. The Te Deum, then, gathers up the prayers and praises of Jerusalem over the centuries, fulfilled in Jesus Christ.

It also, however, gathers up how the nations have been able to "feel after him, and find him" in whom "we live, and move, and have our being" (Acts 17:27-28):

It begins with equal majesty and simplicity: "We praise thee, O God, we acknowledge thee to be the Lord." And not we alone, but "all the earth doth worship thee, the Father everlasting": every corner of it having retained some apprehensions of a supreme Ruler; on which is founded that of St. Paul to the Athenians, "Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you," Acts xvii.23. 

The prayers of Athens "to the Unknown God" are thus also gathered up in the Te Deum and pointed to their fulfillment in the God of Israel, the God and Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Tertullian's jibe (and the uses to which it has been put) is answered and refuted daily at Mattins in the praises of the Te Deum.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...